-
Archives
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- March 2022
- April 2018
- March 2018
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- April 2015
- March 2015
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
-
Meta
Book Review: Love, Insha Allah
This entry was posted in Book Review and tagged courtship, Cross-Cultural Communication, Islam, love, marriage, Religion. Bookmark the permalink.
I just admire your talent in summarizing and presenting any book.Good review.
Genetic homosexuality is not unlawful. What is unlawful is voluntary homosexuality. That is a person who is straight yet still chooses to engage in homosexual behaviour. The people of Prophet Lot were not genetically homosexual. They were straight people who also engaged in homosexual behaviour. An evidence of this in the Quran is Prophet Lot’s wife who was obviously straight yet still engaged in homosexual behaviours.
Thank you, Issam. You raise an interesting point– that a minority of homosexuals are capable of functioning as straight people. Does that mean that they choose homosexual behavior? Superficially, yes. Most straight people, however, are mortified at the thought doing anything with someone of the same gender, so where does the “urge” come from? It’s not natural to those of us who don’t have it, but perfectly natural to those who do.
While genetic homosexuality is not unlawful, as you say, voluntary homosexuality is haram. Until science idenitifies the means by which individuals develop as genetic or voluntarily gay, only the involved individuals can honestly determine where they belong. The story of Lot teaches us on several levels.
While some people interpret it as condemning homosexuality unequivocally, others can say that it tells us we must face the situation objectively, learn all we can about it, especially from the physiological perspective. Those who behave as Lot’s people behaved would be better equiped to decide their paths.
“None have turned their backs on Islam.” That’s one of the key points of our book, Alhamdulillah! Thanks for the wonderful review!
My pleasure, Safiyyah. Mabrook– congratulations– to you and all the others who’ve told your stories honestly, and did not reject Islam even when it seemed to make your lives more difficult than necessary.
The fact that none of you left Islam is as interesting as the stories themselves. Other women in the same situation have left Islam. What’s the difference between them and you-all?
I don’t know, but I do know that most Muslims love their religion, and get blessings from it outweighing the advantages of securlaism or other religions.
If one is a revert. I think it is about the intention. If a woman converts for marriage she is more apt to leave the religion if the marriage fails. If she comes to Islaam for Allaah, it is a bit easier IMO to view it as a test or a necessary means if character development.
Heck, I never had trouble getting a man 🙂 Until I was a Muslim. Then all of a sudden there were too many things “wrong” with me. It can be a self esteem killer if a woman doesn’t have a strong faith in Allaah and herself.
LOL! I never thought about “getting a man” before Islam vs. after Islam, but now that you mention it, there is a difference. I think the difference is not about the woman, but about the available men. Here in America, the pickings are slim, even for young, unmarried women. My daughters settled for men whom they might have passed up had we been living in Egypt or Saudi Arabia.
As you suggest, a convert (I know, I know…some of you say “revert”) for marriage may not be as committed as one who was Muslim before marriage. All the women who contributed to the book were Muslims, either from birth or conversion (I know, I know why some of you say “reversion”. I don’t agree with the term, so I don’t use it, but that’s OK. We know what we’re talking about!)
Thanks for this review. Sounds like an interesting book!